by John Nolte
Very early on, before this campaign started in
earnest, live or die, I publicly cast my lot with Gallup and Rasmussen. As a
poll addict going back to 2000, these are the outlets that have always played it
straight. It's got nothing to do with politics and everything to do with
credibility and not wanting to kid myself. So when an outlet like Gallup tells
me Romney is up seven-points, 52-45%, among those who have already voted, that's
very big news.
Just as Gallup did with their
bombshell survey showing that 2012 is looking like a year where Republicans
will enjoy a record three-point turnout advantage over Democrats (a ten-point
shift from 2008), for whatever reason, they buried the lede with this latest
bombshell, as well. When you consider the fact that the CorruptMedia's been
talking for weeks about how Obama's crushing Romney in early voting, you would
think Gallup proving that Narrative a big fat phony lie would be news. Instead,
though, they bury this explosive news at the bottom of a piece headlined: "In
U.S., 15% of Registered Voters Have Already Cast Ballots".
Sounds like a nothing story, right?
Except waaaaay at the bottom we learn this:
Thus far, early voters do not seem to be
swaying the election toward either candidate.
Romney
currently leads Obama 52% to 45% among voters who say they have already cast
their ballots. However, that is comparable to Romney's 51% to 46% lead among all
likely voters in Gallup's Oct. 22-28 tracking polling. At the same time, the
race is tied at 49% among those who have not yet voted but still intend to vote
early, suggesting these voters could cause the race to tighten. However, Romney
leads 51% to 45% among the much larger group of voters who plan to vote on
Election Day, Nov. 6.
When Gallup says early voters don’t seem to be
swaying the election, presumably what they means is that because Romney is ahead
by five points nationally, an early voting advantage of seven-points isn't going
to "sway the election."
Romney's early voting lead in Gallup may not
jive with the CorruptMedia narrative, but it does with actual early vote totals
that have been released and show Romney's early vote totals either beating Obama
in swing states such
as Colorado and Florida or chipping away at the President's advantage in the
others. For example, here's what we know about Ohio's early voting numbers, thus
far:
But here
is what we do know: 220,000 fewer Democrats have voted early in Ohio compared
with 2008. And 30,000 more Republicans have cast
their ballots compared with four years ago. That is a
250,000-vote net increase for a state Obama won by 260,000 votes in
2008.
Something else in this Gallup survey also helps
shed some light on what we're seeing in these sometimes counter-intuitive state
polls. As the headline states, Gallup is showing that only 15% of the public has
already voted. Moreover, they've broken down early voting by region and show
that in the Midwest only 13% of voters have already voted. And yet, many polls
in places like Ohio show a much higher percentage of early voters, some as high
as 30%, which you can bet skews the data. In other words, those polls can't be
correct.
Other than the fact that this is Gallup, another
reason to embrace this poll is due to its very large sample size of 3,312
registered voters.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC
No comments:
Post a Comment