Wednesday, February 01, 2012

AZGOP's Russell Pearce - Mount Russmore or The Great Sphinx?



When Russell Pearce touted his candidacy for 1st Vice-Chair of the Arizona Republican Party at Saturday’s State Mandatory Meeting, a long line of admirers stood at the altar podium of the church sanctuary and testified about their personal relationship with Jesus Pearce.



During the Pearce Revival, we here at PM received calls and texts from PCs and enjoyed the live tweets from the Arizona Capitol Times’ Jim Small. (The Phoenix New Times' Stephen Lemons reported on the show as well.)



No one was more moved by the touch of his master’s hand than Maricopa County Republican Committee Chairman, Rob Haney.



In what can only be described as a pathological case of hero worship, Haney said,


“When you and I are gone, if anyone’s profile is carved into Camelback Mountain,
it will be Russell Pearce’s.”


We suspect that the Haney dinner table conversation goes something like this: "I like to think of Russell as a……"




"Mr. Flake Takes on Washington"





CLICK HERE TO WATCH 'MR. FLAKE TAKES ON WASHINGTON'!

2012 WASTE MANAGEMENT PHOENIX OPEN STARTS TODAY!





Today marks the start of the 2012 Waste Management Phoenix Open! The Silver Pro-Am kicks off the tournament; celebrities like Comedian George Lopez, Arizona Diamondbacks pitching ace Ian Kennedy, Arizona Cardinals Head Coach Ken Whisenhunt, all-time NFL leading rusher Emmitt Smith, rock-n-roll legend Alice Cooper, Diamondbacks Broadcaster Mark Grace and ESPN’s Mark May are scheduled to play in this year’s Waste Management Phoenix Open FBR/Xerox Silver Pro-Am, which tees off at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, February 1st on the TPC Scottsdale’s Stadium Course.









CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO!

Visit the WM Phoenix Open Website for all the events & to purchase tickets!

CLICK HERE

Former veep Dan Quayle, Rep Ben Quayle backing Kirk Adams for Congress - by Dan Nowicki - AZ/DC Blog





The father-son team of former Vice President Dan Quayle and freshman U.S. Rep. Ben Quayle is backing Kirk Adams in the 5th Congressional District's Republican primary.



CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO!


The two Quayles appeared Monday with Adams, a former speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, at a rally at downtown Gilbert's historic landmark water tower. Adams is facing tough GOP competition in the solidly Republican, East Valley-centric district from former U.S. Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz. U.S. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., the incumbent in the district, is running for the U.S. Senate.




"Look, he is the future, along with my son Ben," Dan Quayle said in introducing Adams at the gathering of more than 200 supporters. "He has an understanding and a strong conservative view of how government ought to work. He's already exhibited that in his work at the state Legislature. He's a small businessman. He's committed to his family. He's committed to his community. And it is with a great deal of enthusiasm for me to be here along with my son, and to present to you a person that we're going send to Washington, D.C., if we do our homework and get the volunteers and get the votes out in August."



Speaking a few minutes earlier, Ben Quayle also hailed Adams as part of a new generation of Republicans. He was backing Adams, Ben Quayle said, because the candidate understands that the "greatness" of the country comes "from our individualism, not from the government."




"He understands that we can't continue to put deficits and debt on to future generations, because all deficits are are future tax payments," the younger Quayle said. "So that is why I'm standing with Kirk today, and hopefully you all support him as well. Because he's got a great head on his shoulders, and we need reinforcements."

Dan Quayle, a Paradise Valley resident, was President George H.W. Bush's 1988 running mate and served as vice president from 1989 to 1993. Ben Quayle, of Phoenix, was first elected to the U.S. House in 2010.




For his part, Adams said the battle for the 5th District is just beginning and shrugged off suggestions that Salmon has gotten off to a head start.




"We've geared our campaign to when people are paying attention," Adams told The Arizona Republic before the speakers took to the microphone. "The way we've kind of looked at it is that last year was a bit of a pre-season, and now the regular season starts. We feel like momentum is building for us on the ground in the district. We're focused, and we're running hard."



Soros: Obama, Romney 'Not Much Difference' By Dave Eberhart

Sunday, 29 Jan 2012 07:51 PM






Billionaire financier George Soros thinks that, if Mitt Romney wins the presidency, there will be "little difference" between him and Barack Obama in the White House.Soros offered the reassuring news to liberals across Europe during an interview this week in Davos, Switzerland.




As policymakers from Hong Kong to Canada pressed Greece and its creditors to strike a deal to cut the nation’s debt, Soros pressed in on GOP presidential candidate Romney:"Well, look, either you’ll have an extremist conservative, be it Gingrich or Santorum, in which case I think it will make a big difference which of the two comes in," Soros told Reuters in a videotaped interview.






"If it’s between Obama and Romney, there isn’t all that much difference except for the crowd that they bring with them."
Soros added, "Romney would have to take Gingrich or Santorum as a vice president and you probably have some pretty extreme candidates for the Supreme Court."




"So it won't be that great a difference," he concluded, if Romney becomes president. Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh described Soros' move this way: "He's endorsing Romney. 'Romney, that's cool, no difference, I could go either way that way.'"




Soros also told Reuters that many hedge fund managers in the United States are backing Romney because Obama wants to raise their taxes.Soros predicted that "there won't be a great deal of enthusiasm on either side of the battleground. It will be more civilized than the previous elections have been."




Read more on Newsmax.com: Soros: Obama, Romney 'Not Much Difference' Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!







CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO!

Barack Obama: Polarizer-in-Chief - by Peter Roff - US News & World Report


January 31, 2012

Barack Obama won the White House in a landslide in 2008, posting the most convincing win of any Democrat since Lyndon Johnson in 1964. By promising "hope" and "change," he garnered more than 69 million votes, winning just under 53 percent of the popular vote and 365 votes in the electoral college.

He did it by campaigning as a post-partisan centrist, tapping into the resentment many Americans felt against the party in power over issues ranging from the war in Iraq to the Wall Street bailout. His manner of governing, however, has been a far cry from the kind of president he promised to be.

Beginning with the earliest days of his administration, Obama has come across as a man who doesn't care to listen to the people with whom he disagrees. From his dismissal of GOP congressional critics because "I won" to his walking away from Arizona GOP Gov. Jan Brewer in the middle of a conversation at Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, the president shows little tolerance for those who think differently about the way the nation should be governed. To put it bluntly, the president is a polarizing figure, something that is reflected in the latest Gallup Poll released Friday. Democrats love him, and Republicans? Well, not so much.


According to Gallup, "the historically high gap" between what Republicans and Democrats think of Obama has existed for most
of his tenure in office. "In fact, Obama's Year Three average
68-percentage-point partisan gap is tied for the fourth highest" the venerable polling firm has recorded, going back to the Eisenhower administration—and little surprise, as 80 percent of Democrats and only 12 percent of Republicans approve of the
job he is doing as president.

[Vote now: Will Obama be a one-term president?]

CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE

Where's Payton? By Gary Varvel



Tuesday, January 31, 2012

This is why Newt Gingrich should be the GOP nominee!

Newt Gingrich was a guest on last night's 'Hannity' show on Fox. Gingrich told Sean what he would do on Day 1 as POTUS!


CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO!

Sarah Palin: Newt 'Crucified' by Romney Allies, She Praises Newt



CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO

Breaking from Newsmax.com

Sarah Palin: Newt 'Crucified' By Romney Allies, GOP Establishment

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says that Newt Gingrich is being "crucified" by the Republican establishment, including allies of Mitt Romney, who are trying to rewrite his record with a barrage of negative attacks.




"Look at Newt Gingrich, what's going on with him via the establishment's attacks," Palin told John Stossel of Fox Business on Thursday, the Huffington Post reported.

She added: "They're trying to crucify this man and rewrite history and rewrite what it is that he has stood for all these years."

Palin has not endorsed any of the GOP presidential candidates, but has been enthusiastically supportive of Gingrich.

Last week before the South Carolina GOP primary Palin said she would vote for Newt Gingrich if she was voting in that state's primary.





She added: 'They're trying to crucify this man and rewrite history and rewrite what it is that he has stood for all these years."

Palin has not endorsed any of the GOP presidential candidates, but has been enthusiastically supportive of Gingrich.

Last week before the South Carolina GOP primary Palin said she would vote for Newt Gingrich if she was voting in that state's primary.

HOPEFULLY, THE END OF FGM! BY HJS



HJS Comments: In these pages the last few years I have written much about Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), especially as practiced by Muslims in the Middle East and Africa and transported to Europe, Canada, and here. One of the main reasons for retaining the barbarous practice, according to the people who approve of the procedure, was to help each female child to remain “pure” until the time when they were married. In some instances, the goal was not achieved, and in other instances, it went beyond its purpose in that the procedure could not be undone when it was time for marriage. In the latter event, one could expect either a cancelled marriage or a quickly annulled one. I hope that I need not describe the procedures; a quick check of the internet will suffice to bring you every bloody detail, although it does nothing to describe the pain and suffering of the little girls who must endure this madness, both the dead and the living.


Medical science generally decries these procedures that have resulted in the death of too many children—I remember the European newspapers reporting finding the bodies of these victims discarded in vacant lots or behind buildings, until such reporting was stopped because of the bad publicity it was giving the immigration programs Europe’s leaders felt they needed. Last year an America medical association attempted to step in and help make the procedures more sanitary by providing our doctors with guidance in providing their services in the process, but we and others quickly launched objections that brought forth protests from many sources, motivating the association to withdraw such support. They did not get the point, apparently. To help the little girls one does not try to make the procedures safer; one tries to stop people from doing them!


One of the most important justifications for continuing the process in the light of the harm it did to the innocent victims—one’s own daughters and granddaughters—was Dawud’s hadith 5251, in which the prophet is said to have offered suggestions to a person engaged in the cutting. I have complained in these pages that the hadith was weak and had not the force of law and could not be used as such. I can now offer as evidence the Grand Mufti of Egypt’s fatwa on the issue. The Grand Mufti, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, stated in RESPONDING FROM THE TRADITION: One Hundred Contemporary Fatwas by the Grand Mufti of Egypt[i], that all of the hadiths relating to FGM are “weak and flawed and cannot be used as evidence”.


From page 98 thru page 104, the sheikh attacks FGM whole heartedly, showing that the procedure is not required by the Shariah, has nothing to do with religion, and it does great harm to the innocent young children and society. He states in the end that "...medical specialists have come to the consensus that even the least invasive of the circumcision procedures cause harm.



Thus it has become necessary to prevent female circumcision by saying that it is forbidden and to criminalize its practice."


The Middle East is obviously undergoing much upheaval at present; however, nothing happening there should affect the power of this fatwa. Because it was written with the consensus of many scholars, not just those with the same political view, the fatwa, like many others, should survive the present upheaval and any that follow. Anyone not married to the destructive traditions of the past could not help but support this fatwa.


As the Grand Mufti said, the scholars who had approved FGM in the past “wanted to avoid abandoning something that we had inherited. If, however, they had seen the recent studies upon which I am basing my opinion, then they would have acceded to the agreement of the medical community just as they taught us to do. The issue of female circumcision does not allow for much difference of opinion now that its facts have come to light. And God is Most High and knows best.”



We must never forget the staying power of ignorance; ignorance, like the poor, will always be with us. Nonetheless, we must see that the bloody and deadly snake that is FGM is stopped now and never
raises its ugly head again!

HJS
[i] Publisher Fons Vitae, Louisville, KY, 2011

New Website: 'TALE'S OF MITT'








CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE VIDEO


Recent Tales of Mitt...

During the CNN Debate on January 26th, on at least five occasions, Mitt Romney spun five mighty yarns to hide his record as a Massachusetts Moderate.

"Voting Democrat"

Governor Romney said, "I've never voted for a Democrat when there was a Republican on the ballot... I have always voted for a Republican any time there was a Republican on the ballot."

Quite the tall tale! You see, in March 1992, during the Massachusetts primary, he had the opportunity to vote for George HW Bush or Pat Buchanan in the Republican primary, but chose instead to vote for Democrat Paul Tsongas in the Democratic primary.


"Blind Trust"

Governor Romney said, in response to the revelation that he profited off of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, "my investments for the last 10 years have been in a blind trust, managed by a trustee."

But ye 'ol National Journal reports, at least one fund in which Governor Romney made between 15K and 50K in interest from investments, was not a blind trust and included investments in Fannie and Freddie.

"Haven't Seen the Ad (which I approved)"

When asked about an ad being run by the his campaign which misquotes Speaker Gingrich, Governor Romney claimed, "I haven't seen the ad, so I'm sorry. I don't get to see all the TV ads."

Yet in the ad, Governor Romney says (in Spanish) that he approves the message. So was which was the tall tale? Approving the message or not seeing the ad?

"Half of Uninsured Got Insurance On Own"

Governor Romney said of those who got healthcare coverage after Romneycare was passed who did not have coverage before, "Half of those people got insurance on their own. Others got help in buying the insurance."

The ledgers tell ad different tale. In fact, 98% of the additional people insured after Romneycare was passed have it paid for or subsidized by the federal government or Massachusetts government. Of the 412,000 additional people who had health insurance in 2010 who did not have it in June 2006 (pre-reform), only 7K of the 412K (1.7%) had unsubsidized health insurance. The rest were covered through Medicaid, Commonwealth Care, or a program of subsidized care for the unemployed.

"Romneycare Only Affects Uninsured"

Speaking about the impact of Romneycare, Governor Romney said "92 percent of the people in my state had insurance before our plan went in place. And nothing changes for them."

If only this were true! Romneycare has increased the price of healthcare premiums for every citizen of Massachusetts. Premiums have increased by 55 percent since Mitt Romney became Governor, a rate 13 points higher than the national average and the third highest growth rate among the states. So every Massachusetts resident has been affected by this destructive law. In addition, the plan gives incentives to employers to drop their healthcare coverage, so many of those with healthcare coverage from their employers are now at greater risk of losing it.


Click here to read more Tales of Mitt.

Obama: The most polarizing president. Ever. - The Washington Post





at 06:30 AM ET, 01/30/2012


President Obama ran — and won — in 2008 on the idea of uniting the country. But each of his first three years in office has marked historic highs in political polarization, with Democrats largely approving of him and Republicans deeply disapproving.




For 2011, Obama’s third year in office, an average of 80 percent of Democrats approved of the job he was doing in Gallup tracking polls, as compared to 12 percent of Republicans who felt the same way. That’s a 68-point partisan gap, the highest for any president’s third year in office — ever. (The previous high was George W. Bush in 2007, when he had a 59 percent difference in job approval ratings.)




In 2010, the partisan gap between how Obama was viewed by Democrats versus Republicans stood at 68 percent; in 2009, it was 65 percent. Both were the highest marks ever for a president’s second and first years in office, respectively.



What do those numbers tell us? Put simply: that the country is hardening along more and more strict partisan lines.




While it’s easy to look at the numbers cited above and conclude that Obama has failed at his mission of bringing the country together, a deeper dig into the numbers in the Gallup poll suggests that
the idea of erasing the partisan gap is simply impossible, as political polarization is rising rapidly.



Out of the ten most partisan years in terms of presidential job approval in Gallup data, seven — yes, seven — have come since 2004. Bush had a run between 2004 and 2007 in which the partisan disparity of his job approval was at 70 points or higher.




CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE

Super Bowl Moving Day By Gary Varvel