hjs Comments: Again Israel is explaining to the "Palestinians" and the world what neither wants to hear. However, I feel it necessary to remind some people that "Palestinian" is a relatively new term and that it usually refers to Arabs who live in the ancient Jewish homeland of Judea and Samaria. In addition, whenever we refer to "the world" these days, we refer primarily to Leftist Europe, Leftist South America, and a few less vocal countries.
It is necessary to clear up the audiences because the
unchangeable agenda of the "Palestinians" demands the absolute disappearance of the Jews from Israel--and from the earth for that matter--so why should they listen to anything Jews have to say that promises less than their total evacuation of Israel?
As for Leftist Europe, economics and self-serving politics reject the idea of a heroic Israel holding at bay a number of Arab states that are continually planning, hoping, and praying for Israel's complete destruction. Indeed, to be able to maintain their idea of a domineering, predatory Israel, Europe has to ignore the obvious lies, deceits, obfuscations, and false statistics of Middle Eastern spokesman, many of whom know the truth and understand that others know the truth, but they present the untruth anyway to salve the official consciences and to change the official perceptions. To these actors, no one else appears to matter, except the United States--and only half of that matters.
As usual, Dr. Pipes has it right. But one should read the article twice, once with the view of obtaining news and information, and a second time (if possible) with the selfish views of the "Palestinians" and the Europeans. What a difference!
HJS
Avigdor Lieberman's Brilliant Debut
by Daniel PipesFrontPageMagazine.comApril 2, 2009
http://www.danielpipes.org/6258/avigdor-liebermans-brilliant-debut
Avigdor Lieberman became foreign minister of Israel yesterday. He celebrated his inauguration with a maiden speech that news reports indicate left his listeners grimacing, squirming, and aghast. The BBC, for example, informs us that his words prompted "his predecessor Tzipi Livni to interrupt and diplomats to shift uncomfortably."
Too bad for them – the speech leaves me elated. Here are some of the topics Lieberman covered in his 1,100-word stem-winder:
The world order: The Westphalia order of states is dead, replaced by a modern system that includes states, semi-states, and irrational international players (e.g., Al-Qaeda, perhaps Iran).
World priorities: These must change. The free world must focus on defeating the countries, forces, and extremist entities "that are trying to violate it." The real problems are coming from "the direction of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq" – and not the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Egypt: Lieberman praises Cairo as "a stabilizing factor in the regional system and perhaps even beyond that" but puts the Mubarak government on notice that he will only go there if his counterpart comes to Jerusalem.
Repeating the word "peace": Lieberman poured scorn on prior Israeli governments: "The fact that we say the word 'peace' twenty times a day will not bring peace any closer."
The burden of peace: "I have seen all the proposals made so generously by Ehud Olmert, but I have not seen any result." Now, things have changed: "the other side also bears responsibility" for peace and must ante up.
The Road Map: The speech's most surprising piece of news is Lieberman's focus on and endorsement of the Road Map, a 2003 diplomatic initiative he voted against at the time but which is, as he puts it, "the only document approved by the cabinet and by the Security Council." He calls it "a binding resolution" that the new government must implement. In contrast, he specifically notes that the government is not bound by the Annapolis accord of 2007 ("Neither the cabinet nor the Knesset ever ratified it").
Implementing the Road Map: Lieberman intends to "act exactly" according to the letter of the Road Map, including its Tenet and Zinni sub-documents. Then comes one of his two central statements of the speech:
I will never agree to our waiving all the clauses - I believe there are 48 of them - and going directly to the last clause, negotiations on a permanent settlement. No. These concessions do not achieve anything. We will adhere to it to the letter, exactly as written. Clauses one, two, three, four - dismantling terrorist organizations, establishing an effective government, making a profound constitutional change in the Palestinian Authority. We will proceed exactly according to the clauses. We are also obligated to implement what is required of us in each clause, but so is the other side. They must implement the document in full.
The mistake of making concessions: He notes the "dramatic steps and made far-reaching proposals" of the Sharon and Olmert governments and then concludes, "But I do not see that [they] brought peace. To the contrary. … It is precisely when we made all the concessions" that Israel became more isolated, such as at the Durban Conference in 2001. Then follows his other central statement:
We are also losing ground every day in public opinion. Does
anyone think that concessions, and constantly saying "I am prepared to concede," and using the word "peace" will lead to anything? No, that will just invite pressure, and more and more wars. "Si vis pacem, para bellum" - if you want peace, prepare for war, be strong.Israeli strength: Lieberman concludes with a rousing call to fortitude: "When was Israel at its strongest in terms of public opinion around the world? After the victory of the Six Day War, not after all the concessions in Oslo Accords I, II, III and IV."
1 comment:
i like your blog......
Post a Comment