I HOPE YOU’RE TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT HONOR KILLING! BY HJS

I HOPE YOU’RE TIRED OF HEARING ABOUT HONOR KILLING!


If you are, good; because I am tired of writing about it. Below, read about three more teenagers killed for being teenagers in America. I thank Human Events for the story and the links. First, let me tell you that the sharia allows parents to kill their children and grandchildren without penalty. Sometimes a Muslim state will try to keep such killing under control with national laws that do not sanction killing children; however, it is very difficult to enforce national laws when they conflict with the sharia in Muslim countries. In Muslim countries, sharia is usually paramount. The Islamists in Europe and the United States are working feverishly to bring in the votes to replace western law with the sharia. It could not happen in the West? Think again; the U.K. has at least 85 sharia courts operating there with the decisions of those courts being enforced.


It does not take much to get on the good side of some politicians for some reason. It would not take many politicians to bring in the sharia here. Some of them already like the idea—Liberals who never did like the Constitution because it gave the people the power, not the president or the Congress. Some politicians, Liberals, do not like the idea of the common person having the right to defend himself and his family. Fortunately, not all Liberals think that way; some of them are decent and intelligent. Funny thing, some congresspeople say that we don’t know what is good for us. The Quran also says that about Muslims. We don’t know what is good for us! One thing for sure, the sharia is not good for us and congresspeople who believe we should have the sharia are not good for us—and they have to go! And Honor Killing has to go! NOW!



HJS


HUMAN EVENTS ADVOCACY

Sharia Law: Muslim "honor killing" of 3 North American teen girls. Take action!Our friends at OneNewsNow.com broke a shocking story of how Muslim Sharia Law is privately enforced in North America with "honor killings" of children. This give us yet another reason to petition Congress to ban Sharia law in American courts, excerpts follow:









KINGSTON, Ontario - A jury on Sunday found an Afghan father, his wife and their son guilty of killing three teenage sisters and a co-wife in what the judge described as "cold-blooded, shameful murders" resulting from a "twisted concept of honor."









The jury took 15 hours to find Mohammad Shafia, 58; his wife Tooba Yahya, 42; and their son Hamed, 21, each guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in a case that shocked and riveted Canadians from coast to coast. First-degree murder carries an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years.









After the verdict was read, the three defendants again declared their innocence in the killings of sisters Zainab, 19, Sahar 17, and Geeti, 13, as well as Rona Amir Mohammad, 52, Shafia's childless first wife in a polygamous marriage.Their bodies were found June 30, 2009, in a car submerged in a canal in Kingston, Ontario, where the family had stopped for the night on their way home to Montreal from Niagara Falls, Ontario.Prosecutors said the defendants allegedly killed the three teenage sisters because they dishonored the family by defying its disciplinarian rules on dress, dating, socializing and going online.









Shafia's first wife was living with him and his second wife. The polygamous relationship, if revealed, could have resulted in their deportation...Judge Robert Maranger was unmoved, saying the evidence clearly supported their conviction for "the planned and deliberate murder of four members of your family."









"It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous crime ... the apparent reason behind these cold-blooded, shameful murders was that the four completely innocent victims offended your completely twisted concept of honor ... that has absolutely no place in any civilized society."...









The family had left Afghanistan in 1992 and lived in Pakistan, Australia and Dubai before settling in Canada in 2007. Shafia, a wealthy businessman, married Yahya because his first wife could not have children...The prosecution said her parents found condoms in Sahar's room as well as photos of her wearing short skirts and hugging her Christian boyfriend, a relationship she had kept secret. Geeti was becoming almost impossible to control: skipping school, failing classes, being sent home for wearing revealing clothes and stealing, while declaring to authority figures that she wanted to be placed in foster care, according to the prosecution...









The prosecution presented wire taps and cell phone records from the Shafia family in court to support their honor killing theory. The wiretaps, which capture Shafia spewing vitriol about his dead daughters, calling them treacherous and whores and invoking the devil to defecate on their graves, were a focal point of the trial."There can be no betrayal, no treachery, no violation more than this," Shafia said on one recording. "Even if they hoist me up onto the gallows ... nothing is more dear to me than my honor."...









[CHAPS COMMENT: Murder, honor killings, polygamy, child abuse, this is how the Koran teaches families to behave under Sharia law, which is secretly enforced by Muslim communities through their mosques all over North America. We must demand Congress act today, to stop Sharia law from being enforced in any American courts.]Please select here to sign urgent petition, and we will fax all 535 Congressmen and Senators (saving you time!) to Stop Activist Judges from enforcing Sharia or Foreign Law in American courts. Ask Congress to pass H.R. 973 today!









Congresswoman: Stop judges who promote Sharia and Foreign Law over Constitution









.Conservative Congresswoman Sandy Adams (R-FL) has taken a stand for liberty and to defend the U.S. Constitution and US law, by sponsoring a bill that stops liberal activist judges from enforcing Muslim Sharia law, or foreign laws, in American Courts. Adams wrote an op-ed article explaining her bill, saying in part:









"Imagine waking up one Sunday morning and reading the headline in your local newspaper: 'Supreme Court rules that the press can't question the president,' and imagine that their ruling cited international case law from nations like China or Cuba, where it is illegal to question the word of the executive branch. While this idea may seem far-fetched, it is a daunting possibility."Foreign law poses a very real threat to the American judicial system...Our Constitution laid the foundation for our nation's judicial system, and referencing or using foreign law in American courts will lead to its erosion..."









That is why I have introduced legislation to protect our Constitution and federal court systems from this type of practice. My two-page bill, H.R. 973, simply states that 'in any court created by or under Article III of the Constitution of the United States, no justice, judge, or other judicial official shall decide any issue in a case before that court in whole or in part on the authority of foreign law, except to the extent the Constitution or an Act of Congress requires the consideration of that foreign law.'"









Not only is using international precedent a transparent disregard for the Constitution, but it could be used to advance a judge's personal political agenda over the best interests of the nation. Judges have a responsibility to interpret the laws of the land, not legislate from the bench, and the practice of referring to foreign law puts their underlying motives into question.









There are three particular Supreme Court cases where judges have cited foreign and international precedent: Lawrence v. Texas, where the court overturned state anti-sodomy statutes; Atkins v. Virginia, where the court held against the execution of mentally retarded capital defendants; and Roper v. Simmons, where the court outlawed application of the death penalty to offenders who were under 18 when their crimes were committed. International and foreign laws were cited in all three cases by our Supreme Court justices in reaching their decisions, setting precedent for future rulings..."[Chaps comment: Passing HR 973 could reverse Lawrence, and help ban sodomy!]









Adams continued: "Currently there are over a dozen states that have introduced legislation banning foreign law on the state level - including the state I represent, Florida...[it has] become a fixture of the confirmation process for Supreme Court justices. In her 2010 confirmation hearing, Elena Kagan was questioned by Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, who asked if she thought international law should factor into a federal court's decision-making process. She confirmed that she did, stating: 'I think it depends. There are some cases in which the citation of foreign law, or international law, might be appropriate.'









"This kind of practice begs the question: Are we going to allow our court systems to dictate our policymaking process based off of foreign sources or are we going to go through the proper channels prescribed by our Constitution? We must remember that we have an American judicial system in place for a reason; it is based off of our country's rich history and it is intentionally unique to our great nation. As we move forward as a country, we must work to protect it."--Rep. Sandy Adams represents Florida's 24th Congressional District.[Chaps comment: Let's stand with Congresswoman Sandy Adams, and petition all 535 Congressmen and Senators to co-sponsor and pass her bill to stop Sharia in US courts.]God Bless you, in Jesus' name,Chaplain Gordon James KlingenschmittFor media interviews, select here.





Prefer to donate by mail? Please write: The Pray In Jesus Name Project, PO Box 77077, Colorado Springs, CO 80970. Disclaimer: The views of Chaplain Klingenschmitt, who was honorably but involuntarily discharged from the Navy in 2007 after facing court-martial for praying "in Jesus name" in uniform, (but was later vindicated by Congress), are his own personal views, not the views of any political party, government, or organization.