HJS COMMENTS
NO SHARIA HERE
HJS Comments: The last I knew, this country of ours is the United States of America, not Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, or Yemen. The people who live, love, work, play, and sue each other in this country are Americans—and it does not matter whether they are Christians, Jews, Muslims, Polytheists, Agnostics, or Atheists; they still fall under the Constitution of the United States, and the American court system. In my view, if the Liberal view here is that even illegal aliens and enemy combatants are protected by the Constitution and the courts, then what is this Florida Judge doing, ignoring our laws and instead reverting to a seventh century system of laws developed concomitant with the Quran, an Arab religious document which holds that believers in Jesus Christ as the Son of God are polytheists—idol worshippers; people who do not believe in Islam are the vilest of animals; and which has created a permanent state of jihad against non-Muslim states? How can anyone in this country defer to a system of laws which hold that killing a non-Muslim by a Muslim is not a crime [o1.2(2)], and in which parents and grandparents can kill their children [o1.2(3)], and in which lying is permissible--even in court—to avoid penalties [r8.2]?
No jurist in this great country of ours should be referring to the sharia in any case whatsoever! Anyone who does, besides a few other penalties I can think of, must be made aware of a debilitating disease found in this country called creeping sharia, in which many stupid people whom Lenin referred to as “helpful idiots” think it is “cool” to act in the role of Judas Goat. The role is fine for goats, goats turn off at the last minute; humans don’t.
Link: http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/
ORDER IN CONNECTION WITH PLAINTIFFS’ EMERGENCY MOTION TO
ENFORCE ARBITOR’S AWARD
THIS CAUSE came before the Court, on Defendant’s February 23, 2011 ore tenus motion for a written order memorializing the oral interlocutory order announced by the Court during the evidentiary hearing that began January 10, 2011. The Court has made the following findings and rulings in connection with Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Enforce Arbitrator’s Award:
1, This case will proceed under Ecclesiastical Islamic Law.
2. Under Ecclesiastical Islamic law, pursuant to the Qur’an, Islamic brothers should try to resolve a dispute amongst themselves. When the brothers are unable to do so, they can agree to present the dispute to the greater community of brothers within the mosque or the Muslim community for resolution. If that is not done or does not result in a resolution of the dispute, the dispute is to be presented to an Islamic judge for determination, and that is or can be an A’lim.
3. The remainder of the hearing will be to determine whether Islamic dispute resolution procedures have been followed in this matter.
DONE AND ORDERED etc…
No comments:
Post a Comment