US District Judge Ann Montgomery obviously has no knowledge of Islam and its rules and may be relying on “experts” who either are not so expert or are following the same agenda followed by the “Six Imams”. Islam is traveler-friendly and allows for alternatives to the usual rules for travelers. If the “imams” know their religion, they know all of this and may be troublemakers with an agenda. Whatever their motives are, the judge should not have bought into it. STUPIDITY AND IGNORANCE REIGN IN THIS COUNTRY NOW!http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58887
MORE STUPIDITY AND IGNORANCE. Now, whom does Abu Abas represent? Certainly not the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians. And whom does Olmert represent? Certainly not the 61% of the Israelis who want him out and have wanted him out for a long time. We won’t even talk about the American President who thinks more of illegal aliens that he thinks of the American working man. When Trans-Jordan stole 75% of the land set aside for Jews (the British were too intimidated to take it back), that should have been more than enough for the “State set aside for the Arabs living in Palestine (There was no such thing as Palestinians, so I am not confusing the issue by calling them what they are not.). Now, 75% that King Abdullah stole, only left 25% of the Jewish state (much of which was purchased by Jews independently) for the Jews. The UN, conveniently forgetting that Jordan is the “Palestinian State” by virtue of its absorbing 75% of Palestine, and that it is an Arab state in Palestine, took another 50% from the 25% left after Jordan’s theft for the purpose of creating a PALETINIAN STATE (another one? Get real!). And for years, the Arab states have engaged in the humiliating damage control by not absorbing the refugees, to force the UN and world opinion to denounce Israel and chip away at her remaining 12% of the land she was promised. Olmert is not a good representative of Israel, just as Abu Abas is not the official representative of the “Palestinians”.
As the next two referenced articles show, it is just more nonsense. We would expect Secretary Rice to know better. The negotiations, if we are lucky, will come to naught.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58874
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58878
One would think that giving Vice President Cheney’s health problems, the VP would do the country a big favor and step down and let a healthy person do the job. By so doing, the president can appoint a vice president candidate, which will keep our ineffective and inept legislative body busy digging in the dirt for the next year or so. If by some stroke of unusual good fortune the congress does manage to do the job it is being paid to do (from what I have seem, we should demand our money back) and consent to a decent vice president who does a good job, it would definitely cut down on our number of choices next election. I have no objection to Mr. Cheney personally, just his health and the health of this country, neither of which is impressive at the moment.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21979310/
There was nothing wrong with what this teacher did, nor was there anything wrong with what the kids did. If the “Old Beards” of any religion are so sensitive that they become outraged at such kiddy activities that they go and hunt up the police (other folks want more drastic action), the wrong person was arrested. The “Old Beards” should have been arrested by the folks in the white coats. I am sure that none of the kiddies even thought the teddy bear looked liked their Messenger (pbuh). So naming him as they did violated no such injunction. Look at all the thieves and murderers with the same name—are their parents being arrested for saying their children were representations of the Messenger (pbuh)? No? Then you cannot arrest the teacher without arresting parents of children given the same name as that teddy bear. The name that the children chose would have pleased the namesake; they honored him—if they chose his name; however, they chose the name of another person, a classmate, who just happened to have the same name. So the entire issue is moot at worst. Time for some folks to find something useful to occupy their minds. Tempest in a teapot? Not even that. More like a hiccup in the outhouse.
http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSL2664659420071126?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews&rpc=22&sp=true
I really only have one thing to say about bin Laden and his messages: Who cares?
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=071126203123.9iew792o&show_article=1
HJS
No comments:
Post a Comment