From The Detroit News
Editorial
June 16, 2008
PDF Format
Sen. Barack Obama brings his economic plan to Michigan today, and there's much in it to concern a state desperate for investment and job growth.
The strategy detailed on the presumed Democratic presidential nominee's Web site envisions an economy that gets a strong, guiding hand from government, with big new spending programs to stimulate growth.
But developing jobs with tax dollars is never as good as encouraging them with private-sector incentives, and there's little of that in Obama's proposals. ...
While soaking the rich might have some political resonance, it's risky to strip investment incentives from those most likely to create jobs. ... [T]he top 1 percent of American earners still carry 35.6 percent of the tax burden...
The senator claims to be a free-trader, but he couches his language on trade in ways designed not to offend voters in industrialized states such as Michigan. He opposes the Central American Free Trade Agreement, a pact that could help America solidify its relationships in a worrisome part of the world, and says he would retool the North American Free Trade Agreement to make it more responsive to American labor concerns.
He should keep in mind that Canada is the largest oil exporter to the United States, and Mexico is not far behind. Reopening NAFTA risks changes that could further raise fuel prices here.
Obama would also extend the Family and Medical Leave Act to smaller employers... Those policies have the potential of moving the United States toward a European work force model, with its negative impact on productivity and economic output.
[And] Obama's support of a proposal to allow unions to organize a workplace without a secret ballot election would rob workers of a basic right. ...
CLICK HERE To View The Entire Article
Editorial
June 16, 2008
PDF Format
Sen. Barack Obama brings his economic plan to Michigan today, and there's much in it to concern a state desperate for investment and job growth.
The strategy detailed on the presumed Democratic presidential nominee's Web site envisions an economy that gets a strong, guiding hand from government, with big new spending programs to stimulate growth.
But developing jobs with tax dollars is never as good as encouraging them with private-sector incentives, and there's little of that in Obama's proposals. ...
While soaking the rich might have some political resonance, it's risky to strip investment incentives from those most likely to create jobs. ... [T]he top 1 percent of American earners still carry 35.6 percent of the tax burden...
The senator claims to be a free-trader, but he couches his language on trade in ways designed not to offend voters in industrialized states such as Michigan. He opposes the Central American Free Trade Agreement, a pact that could help America solidify its relationships in a worrisome part of the world, and says he would retool the North American Free Trade Agreement to make it more responsive to American labor concerns.
He should keep in mind that Canada is the largest oil exporter to the United States, and Mexico is not far behind. Reopening NAFTA risks changes that could further raise fuel prices here.
Small businesses, in particular, have reason to be wary of Obama's
economic plan. He would raise the minimum wage and then index it to inflation, guaranteeing that labor costs on small firms would rise annually, even if the businesses revenues don't follow suit. ...
Obama would also extend the Family and Medical Leave Act to smaller employers... Those policies have the potential of moving the United States toward a European work force model, with its negative impact on productivity and economic output.
[And] Obama's support of a proposal to allow unions to organize a workplace without a secret ballot election would rob workers of a basic right. ...
CLICK HERE To View The Entire Article
No comments:
Post a Comment